The 2 high Republicans up for the job of Senate Majority Chief in the event that they take the Senate within the upcoming election talked about how they’d thwart a Kamala Harris agenda together with potential Supreme Courtroom nominees.
Senator John Thune of South Dakota advised CNN’s Manu Raju that if Kamala Harris wins the presidency and Republicans take the senate, there isn’t any abortion proposal that may get sixty votes within the Senate and when requested if he may see himself permitting any Harris Supreme Courtroom nominee to be confirmed, Thune mentioned it will depend upon who it was.
Senator John Cornyn of Texas individually advised Raju he wouldn’t “schedule a vote on some wild eyed radical nominee, which I do know she would like to nominate.”
Watch:
NEW: “I am not going to schedule a vote on some wild-eyed radical nominee, which I do know she would like to nominate.” @mkraju‘s new reporting on how @SenJohnThune and @JohnCornyn may throw up roadblocks for a possible President Harris. https://t.co/5RHjVGkE12 #InsidePolitics pic.twitter.com/nIAPOb9IbR
— Inside Politics (@InsidePolitics) September 29, 2024
Raju requested: Would you place a nationwide abortion ban on the ground for majority chief?
Thune answered that there isn’t *any* abortion proposal that may get 60 votes: I don’t suppose there’s any any abortion proposal that will get sixty votes on the ground of the USA.
Raju: Might you see your self permitting the Supreme Courtroom nominee for Harris to be confirmed?
Thune: Nicely, I imply, clearly in all probability relies on who that’s, and that’s the benefit of getting Republican Senate.
Thune mentioned he wouldn’t change a filibuster on any problem.
One other potential Majority Chief, Texas Senator John Cornyn, additionally mentioned he didn’t suppose an abortion ban would get 60 votes, and that he would completely protect the filibuster.
When Raju requested him if he would enable a affirmation on a Harris Supreme Courtroom nominee, Senator Cornyn mentioned, “It relies upon, I feel, would additionally depend upon who the President nominates,” and that he wouldn’t “schedule a vote on some wild eyed radical nominee, which I do know she would like to nominate.”
Harris is a former prosecutor and Legal professional Common who has been endorsed by scores of former Republican officers and former Trump administration officers, so the concept that she would nominate a “wild eyed radical” to the Supreme Courtroom is laughable. Cornyn’s remark may greatest translate to common voter communicate as he wouldn’t schedule a vote on somebody who would shield primary particular person freedoms like abortion healthcare. It’s odd that Republican management sees primary freedom as radical however taking away lengthy established freedoms as conservative (this isn’t conventional conservatism).
Thune has been barnstorming to spice up Republican Senate candidates.
Republicans have spent since 2009 devoted to obstructing a Democratic president to the purpose of driving the nation over the fiscal cliff and shutting down authorities once they didn’t get items of their radical agenda.
Within the Senate they used that energy to disclaim a vote to then President Obama’s Supreme Courtroom nominee Merrick Garland, who was revered by each side of the aisle. Garland would have made an ideal Supreme Courtroom Choose; he has the reasonable temperament for it and the dedication to the rule of regulation and precedent, in contrast to the three justices Donald Trump placed on the courtroom and naturally in full opposition to the rampant corruption of conservative Justice Clarence Thomas.
So in that context, the best way Cornyn and Thune responded to the abortion ban query was to widen it out to make it about any abortion measure, a manner of wiggling out of being held to account by their base for not committing to passing an abortion ban whereas additionally making room to suggest there may be additionally no manner abortion protections might be codified if Republicans win the senate.
The vast majority of People need the safety of Roe restored. Girls are dying as a result of Republican abortion bans, and others are shedding their fertility and going via pointless worry and ache, akin to medical torture. Republicans are committing to persevering with to permit girls and ladies to die below their rule in the event that they win the senate. It’s price pausing right here to ask ourselves how they outline “pro-life” and why that definition doesn’t embrace the lives of girls and ladies.
Republicans are promising to proceed abusing their energy to impede the desire of the folks, which is an assault on the foundations of freedom and democracy upon which our nation relies upon. They’ve develop into a radicalized social gathering, with widespread sense Republicans marginalized and the acute voices amplified, which is a direct contradiction to the Democratic Get together presently.
